Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT Wireless Review: Still Worth It?

Forget the box art. Forget the "25K DPI" headline. Most serious players run 800 DPI anyway. What actually determines whether a gaming mouse earns its place on your desk is simpler and harder to fake: does it track without fuss, does it weigh nothing, does it fit your hand, and do the clicks feel like clicks rather than soggy disappointment? The Logitech G PRO X SUPERLIGHT Wireless is built around those questions rather than the marketing ones, and that's why it's been sitting near the top of the ultralight wireless pile for a good while now.

The numbers behind this review aren't invented. We're working from Logitech's published specifications, the HERO 25K sensor's documented behaviour, and a pool of over 11,000 owner reviews averaging ★★★★½ (4.6). That's not a small sample. When 11,000 people mostly agree something is good, and the spec sheet backs them up, you can say it with confidence. We'll also tell you where it falls short, because a 4.6 average still leaves room for genuine gripes.

Context matters too. The ultralight wireless market has got genuinely competitive in the last couple of years. Razer's Viper V2 Pro, the Endgame Gear XM2we, Pulsar X2, and even Logitech's own SUPERLIGHT 2 are all in the conversation. So before you spend your money, it's worth knowing exactly where this original SUPERLIGHT sits in that landscape and whether it's still worth buying or whether it's been overtaken by its own successor.

The HERO 25K sensor is Logitech's own design rather than an off-the-shelf PixArt unit, which is worth noting. It's rated up to 25,600 DPI (irrelevant for actual use) but more importantly it's documented as having zero hardware acceleration, zero angle snapping, and zero smoothing at its intended operating range. Logitech's own sensor documentation confirms these figures. That matters far more than the DPI ceiling.

One thing to flag before the specs table: this review covers the original SUPERLIGHT, not the SUPERLIGHT 2. The SUPERLIGHT 2 dropped the HERO 25K in favour of the HERO 2 sensor and shaved another two grams off. If you're buying new, check which generation you're actually getting. The original is still available and still very good, but they're different products at potentially different prices.

At 125.9mm long and 63.5mm wide, this isn't a tiny mouse. Compare that to something like the Pulsar X2 Mini at around 116mm, and you'll feel the difference if you have smaller hands. The 40mm height is fairly standard for an ultralight. Owner reviews consistently mention fit as a positive for medium-to-large hands, with the most common complaint being that players with small hands feel a bit lost on it. If your hand length is under 17cm, you might want to look at smaller options before committing.

The shape itself is clean and unfussy. No aggressive curves, no thumb rests, no ergonomic sculpting that locks you into one grip style. The side walls are relatively flat, which suits claw grip particularly well since your fingers naturally arch over the buttons without the shell pushing back against them. Palm grip users report the rear hump supports the hand nicely without fatigue over long sessions, which is consistent with what the dimensions suggest. There's no RGB on this mouse, which keeps the shell clean and, more practically, keeps the weight down and the battery life up.

For context on how optical mouse sensors work: the sensor takes rapid images of the surface beneath it and calculates movement from the differences between frames. The quality of that calculation determines tracking accuracy. The HERO 25K's documented zero-smoothing behaviour means what you move is what the cursor does, with no interpolation fudging the result. That's the property that actually matters for competitive play, not the DPI ceiling.

Owner reports across the 11,000-plus review pool don't flag sensor issues. No widespread reports of stuttering, erratic tracking, or surface incompatibility problems. The sensor performs on cloth pads, hard pads, and most textured surfaces without complaint. Logitech has been iterating the HERO sensor line for years, and the 25K generation is a mature, well-understood piece of hardware. The HERO 2 in the SUPERLIGHT 2 nudges performance slightly further, but the original HERO 25K is not a bottleneck for any player operating below professional tournament conditions.

The weight distribution is reasonably balanced front to back, with no obvious nose-heavy or tail-heavy bias. That matters for control during fast flick movements in FPS games. A mouse that's heavy at the front tends to over-rotate when you stop a flick; one that's heavy at the back can feel like it's dragging. The SUPERLIGHT avoids both problems. The shell achieves the low weight without holes, which is a deliberate design choice. Logitech went with a solid shell and a lightweight internal structure rather than the honeycomb approach that Glorious and others use. That means no dust accumulation through the shell and no rough edges catching your palm.

The zero-additive PTFE feet are the other half of the glide story. PTFE (polytetrafluoroethylene, the same material as non-stick cookware coating) is the standard for quality mouse feet, but the "zero additive" claim means the feet are purer PTFE without fillers that can make cheaper skates feel rough or sticky. The edges on the stock feet are smooth rather than sharp, which matters on cloth pads where sharp-edged skates can snag on the weave. Owner feedback on the glide is consistently positive, with the most common description being "smooth without being too fast." On a cloth pad at medium speed, that's exactly what you want.

The two side buttons sit on the left flank and are positioned for thumb access without stretching. They're reasonably sized and have a distinct click rather than the vague, spongy feel you get on cheaper mice. The scroll wheel uses a stepped encoder rather than free-spinning, which is the right call for gaming. Free-spinning wheels are fine for productivity but terrible when you need to switch weapons or zoom precisely. The scroll wheel click (middle button) is functional, though a handful of owner reviews mention it requires slightly more force than ideal. Not a dealbreaker, but worth knowing.

One thing worth flagging: the SUPERLIGHT has five programmable buttons total, which is on the lean side compared to MMO mice but absolutely standard for FPS-focused hardware. There's no DPI button on the top shell, which is a deliberate choice. Logitech moved the DPI cycle button to the underside. Some players love this because it prevents accidental DPI changes mid-game. Others find it annoying to have to flip the mouse to change sensitivity. It's a design decision that divides opinion in the review pool, so it's worth thinking about whether you cycle DPI often enough for that to matter to you.

The coating on the white version is smooth matte plastic. It doesn't have the rubber-coated grip sections you find on some mice, which means it can feel slightly slippery with sweaty hands over long sessions. A handful of owner reviews mention this specifically, usually from players who game in warmer environments or run hot. Grip tape is an easy fix and several aftermarket options exist for this exact mouse, but it's a cost you shouldn't have to factor in at this price point. The black version reportedly has a slightly different surface texture that some find grippier, though both are the same base material.

At 63 grams, you might reasonably worry the shell feels hollow or fragile. Owner reviews consistently push back on this. The build feels deliberate rather than cheap, and Logitech's engineering here is about material selection rather than wall thickness reduction. The mouse has held up well in long-term ownership reports, with no widespread complaints about cracking shells, deteriorating coatings, or switch failure at normal use rates. For a mouse in this price bracket, that's the expected standard, and the SUPERLIGHT meets it.

There's no Bluetooth on the SUPERLIGHT. It's LIGHTSPEED only. For a gaming mouse this isn't really a loss since Bluetooth polling rates lag behind 2.4GHz, but if you wanted to use this on a laptop without the dongle it's not an option. The receiver has decent range, and owner reports don't flag dropouts or interference as a common issue even in busy wireless environments. The 2.4GHz band can get congested in offices and shared spaces, but the LIGHTSPEED implementation handles this better than cheaper wireless mice.

The charging connection is micro-USB rather than USB-C. This is the most consistently mentioned complaint in the owner review pool, and it's a fair one. In a world where everything else charges via USB-C, having to keep a micro-USB cable around specifically for your mouse is annoying. Logitech addressed this in the SUPERLIGHT 2, which moved to USB-C. If you're buying the original SUPERLIGHT, factor in that you'll need to keep a micro-USB cable accessible. The charging cradle that comes in the box handles it, but the cable itself is the older standard.

At typical gaming sessions of three to four hours, you're looking at charging roughly once a fortnight. That's a non-issue for most players. The mouse charges via the included micro-USB cable (see the connectivity section for the gripe about that), and a full charge takes around two and a half hours. There's no fast-charge feature, but given the battery life, you're unlikely to be in a situation where you need it urgently. The mouse also doesn't have a battery percentage indicator on the device itself; you check battery level through G HUB software or the LED indicator on the underside.

The power switch on the underside is a physical three-position slider: off, on, and a travel mode that reduces power consumption further for storage. Owner reviews don't flag premature battery drain as an issue, and the auto-sleep function kicks in after a period of inactivity to preserve charge. For a wireless gaming mouse, 70 hours is at the top end of what's available in this category. The Razer Viper V2 Pro manages around 80 hours, and the Endgame Gear XM2we claims 70 hours as well, so the SUPERLIGHT is competitive on this metric without being the absolute leader.

G HUB itself has a reputation for being resource-heavy and occasionally unstable. Owner reviews mention it less than you'd expect for a software-dependent product, which suggests most players set it up once and then leave it running in the background. The interface is more visual than practical, with a lot of click-through to find what you actually want. It's not terrible, but it's not the most efficient piece of software either. If you're on a Mac, G HUB is available but has historically had slightly more stability issues than the Windows version.

The DPI indicator on the underside of the mouse cycles through your configured DPI stages when you press the button. You get up to five DPI stages, which is more than most players use. The polling rate options top out at 1000Hz, which is standard for this generation. The SUPERLIGHT 2 and some competitors now offer 2000Hz or 4000Hz polling via separate receivers, but 1000Hz remains the competitive standard and the difference at anything below very high DPI settings is imperceptible to humans. If you're not sure whether you need higher polling rate, you don't.

For battle royale and third-person games, the same advantages apply. The five-button layout is sufficient for most genres. Where the SUPERLIGHT starts to show its limits is in MMOs or games that benefit from more side buttons. Five buttons is the FPS standard, not the MMO standard. If you're playing World of Warcraft seriously, you want something with at least six to twelve side buttons. The SUPERLIGHT isn't built for that use case and doesn't pretend to be.

Click fatigue over long sessions is worth mentioning because it's something owner reviews touch on. The main switches are light enough that rapid clicking in games like Minecraft or any title requiring sustained left-click actions doesn't cause hand fatigue in the way heavier switches can. The overall weight of the mouse reduces arm and wrist fatigue compared to heavier alternatives. Several long-session players in the review pool specifically mention the SUPERLIGHT as the first mouse they've used without developing wrist soreness after marathon gaming days. That's anecdotal, but it's a consistent thread.

The SUPERLIGHT 2 is the more direct comparison. It uses the HERO 2 sensor, drops to 60 grams, adds USB-C charging, and extends battery life slightly. If you're buying new and the price difference is small, the SUPERLIGHT 2 is the better buy on paper. The original SUPERLIGHT makes sense if you find it at a meaningfully lower price, which does happen. The Pulsar X2 is worth a look if you want a lighter mouse (52 grams) with USB-C and a PixArt PAW3395 sensor at a competitive price, though Pulsar's software and long-term reliability track record is shorter than Logitech's.

The honest summary: the SUPERLIGHT holds its own against the Viper V2 Pro on everything except weight and charging port. Against the Pulsar X2, it loses on weight and port but wins on brand maturity and software stability. Neither competitor makes the SUPERLIGHT irrelevant, especially if you find it at a lower price than its rivals. But if you're buying at full price today and you're not attached to the Logitech ecosystem, the SUPERLIGHT 2 is the smarter pick within the same brand.

The complaints cluster around a few specific points. The micro-USB charging port is the most frequently mentioned frustration, and it comes up enough that it's clearly not just a few outliers. The price is flagged by some reviewers as high relative to what you're physically getting, which is a fair point even if the engineering behind the weight reduction justifies some premium. A smaller number of reviews mention the smooth white coating feeling slippery during longer sessions, and a handful flag the DPI button placement on the underside as inconvenient.

What's notable in the negative reviews is what isn't there. Sensor failures, wireless dropouts, switch double-clicking, and shell cracking are not common themes. The complaints are mostly about design choices Logitech made deliberately rather than quality control failures. That's an important distinction. A mouse that annoys you with its design decisions is a different problem from one that breaks or malfunctions. The SUPERLIGHT's negatives are predictable and manageable; its positives are consistent and meaningful.

For competitive FPS players, the case is strong. The weight advantage is real and measurable in terms of arm fatigue over long sessions and the ease of large, fast mouse movements. The wireless performance removes the last legitimate reason to prefer wired. And the sensor accuracy means you're not fighting the hardware when things go wrong in-game. If you play casually a few hours a week, a mid-range wired mouse at a third of the price will serve you perfectly well and you won't notice the difference.

The value equation also shifts depending on whether you catch it on sale. The original SUPERLIGHT has been available at meaningfully reduced prices since the SUPERLIGHT 2 launched, and at those lower prices the micro-USB complaint stings less. If you're comparing it to the SUPERLIGHT 2 at similar prices, the newer model wins. But if the original is noticeably cheaper, the practical differences are small enough that the original remains a sensible buy.

Button wobble on the main clicks is minimal in current production units. Earlier production had some reports of left-click wobble, but this has been addressed. The side buttons have very little lateral play and feel properly integrated into the shell rather than added as an afterthought. The scroll wheel has a slight amount of horizontal wobble that some reviewers mention, but it doesn't affect function and isn't unusual at this price point.

Long-term durability reports from the owner review pool are positive. The coating doesn't appear to peel or yellow significantly over time based on reviews from owners who've had the mouse for a year or more. The PTFE feet show wear over extended use, as all mouse feet do, but Logitech sells replacement feet and third-party options are widely available for this specific mouse. The micro-USB port is the structural weak point over time since it's a connector standard that sees more wear than USB-C, but widespread port failure isn't a theme in the review data.

The micro-USB port is a genuine annoyance in the current USB-C landscape, and the smooth white coating can feel slippery for players who run warm. The DPI button on the underside is a design choice that divides opinion. And if you're buying today at full price, the SUPERLIGHT 2 addresses the charging port issue and shaves off a couple more grams. So the recommendation comes with a caveat: at a meaningfully lower price than its successor, the original SUPERLIGHT is still a smart buy. At the same price or close to it, get the SUPERLIGHT 2.

Who should buy it? Competitive FPS players who want ultralight wireless without the honeycomb aesthetic, medium-to-large handed palm or claw grip players, and anyone upgrading from a mouse over 80 grams who wants to understand what the weight difference actually feels like. Who should skip it? Left-handers (no left-hand configuration), players with small hands who'd be better served by something around 116mm in length, MMO players who need more side buttons, and anyone for whom micro-USB in 2024 is a hard no.

Score: 8.5 out of 10. Loses points for the charging port and the price-versus-successor comparison. Earns them back for everything else.

If you're not committed to ultralight wireless specifically and want to save money, the Logitech G305 is a much cheaper wireless option with a capable HERO sensor in a lightweight (99g) body. It's not in the same league for competitive play, but for casual gaming it's excellent value. And if you're open to wired, the Endgame Gear XM1r gives you a PixArt PAW3370 sensor in a 70-gram shell with a flexible cable for significantly less money, which is worth knowing if the wireless premium isn't justified by your use case.

Specifications sourced from Logitech's official product page. Always check the current listing for up-to-date details.

Affiliate disclosure: vividrepairs.co.uk participates in affiliate programmes. If you buy through links on this page, we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. This does not influence our editorial position.