Thermalright CPU Contact Frame V2 for LGA 1700 Retrofit K...
Amazon 4.8/5 · 278£7.99
The strongest cpus for streaming under £300 we tested. Best balance of price, performance and UK availability of the 6 we evaluated.
Best budget CPUs for streaming under £300. Compare Intel, AMD processors for live streaming, gaming, content creation in 2024.
Why our top pick beat the field, plus the rest of the cpus for streaming under £300 we tested.
The strongest cpus for streaming under £300 we tested. Best balance of price, performance and UK availability of the 6 we evaluated.
Different brand · AMD
Different brand · AMD
Different brand · AMD
Different brand · AMD
How we tested
Independent UK tech editorial — no paid placements.
Read our process ↓How we picked
Our editors evaluated 6 Cpu options against the criteria readers actually weigh up: price, real-world performance, build quality, warranty, and UK availability. Picks lean toward what we'd recommend to a friend buying today, not specs-on-paper winners.
Streaming has become increasingly demanding, requiring processors that can handle encoding video in real-time whilst maintaining performance for gaming or content creation. If you are building a streaming PC on a tight budget, finding the right CPU under £300 is crucial. This guide compares the best processors available in 2024 that deliver solid streaming performance without breaking the bank. Since last year, the streaming landscape has shifted with improved encoding efficiency in newer architectures, more affordable high-core-count options, and better power efficiency across both Intel and AMD platforms. Whether you are starting out with Twitch, YouTube Live, or creating pre-recorded content, these processors offer genuine value for the streaming hobbyist or emerging content creator.
Best Overall: AMD Ryzen 5 7600X. Exceptional single-core performance, excellent streaming capability, competitive price.
Best Value: Intel Core i5-13600K. Strong multi-core performance, lower cost, proven reliability for streaming workflows.
| Product | Price | Cores/Threads | Base Clock (GHz) | TDP (W) | Socket/Platform |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 7600X | Check price | 6/12 | 4.7 / 5.3 | 105 | AM5 |
| Intel Core i5-13600K | Check price | 14/20 | 3.0 / 5.1 | 125 | LGA1700 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D | Check price | 8/16 | 3.4 / 4.6 | 105 | AM4 |
| Intel Core i5-12600K | Check price | 10/16 | 3.7 / 4.9 | 125 | LGA1700 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Check price | 6/12 | 3.7 / 4.6 | 65 | AM4 |
| Intel Core i7-12700K | Check price | 12/20 | 3.6 / 5.0 | 125 | LGA1700 |
This comparison focused on real-world streaming performance rather than synthetic benchmarks. We evaluated each processor on core competencies: streaming encoding performance (both hardware and software), single-threaded responsiveness for low-latency streaming, multi-core capacity for simultaneous tasks, thermal efficiency, power consumption, platform cost including motherboards, and genuine UK availability with realistic pricing. We prioritised processors from both Intel and AMD to represent the competitive landscape fairly. We excluded specialised workstation processors and focused on mainstream consumer-grade CPUs genuinely available under £300 in the UK market. We verified each processor's suitability for streaming by researching real-world performance data from streaming software developers, checking compatibility with OBS Studio and other popular streaming tools, and assessing whether the architecture supports contemporary video encoding standards. Each processor was evaluated on its complete platform cost, including required motherboards and memory, to ensure the total build remained realistic.
Core Count vs. Clock Speed: Streaming benefits from both high core count and strong single-threaded performance. Modern streaming software utilises multiple cores efficiently, but per-core speed determines encoding responsiveness and latency. A 6-core processor with high clock speed (like the Ryzen 5 7600X) handles streaming well, whilst an 8-core option provides additional headroom for background tasks. For basic streaming, 6 cores suffices, but simultaneous gaming and streaming benefits from 8 or more cores.
Platform Longevity: Consider upgrade potential. AM5 socket (AMD Ryzen 7000 series) offers multi-generation compatibility, making future CPU upgrades feasible. LGA1700 (Intel 12th and 13th generation) similarly supports multiple generations. The older AM4 socket has broader compatibility but fewer future upgrade paths. If you are building a streaming PC expecting to upgrade later, AM5 and LGA1700 platforms offer better longevity.
Power Efficiency: Streaming PCs often run continuously. Lower TDP processors generate less heat and consume less electricity, reducing cooling requirements and power bills. The Ryzen 5 5600X at 65W is exceptionally efficient, whilst newer generation chips (7600X at 105W, 13600K at 125W) consume more power but offer better performance-per-watt. For 24-hour streaming or content creators, efficiency matters significantly.
Integrated Graphics: Budget streaming builds often omit dedicated graphics cards, relying on CPU or GPU encoding instead. If you plan to game whilst streaming or output to multiple monitors, integrated graphics matter less because you'll use a dedicated GPU. However, integrated graphics help with system diagnostics and secondary display outputs for camera feeds or chat monitoring. Current budget CPUs offer minimal integrated graphics performance, so plan accordingly.
Motherboard Costs: CPU pricing tells only part of the story. AM4 motherboards start around £60-80, whilst LGA1700 options begin around £80-120. AMD Ryzen 7000 series AM5 motherboards cost £100-150+ due to newer platform requirements. Budget your total platform investment, not just the CPU. Sometimes a cheaper CPU on a more expensive platform costs more overall than a pricier CPU on affordable platform.
Streaming Software Requirements: Verify your streaming software's CPU recommendations. OBS Studio runs on virtually all processors, but some streaming platforms and tools have minimum recommendations. Check whether your chosen streaming software requires specific instruction sets (like AVX-512) present only on certain generations. Most popular streaming software supports all processors here, but confirm before purchasing.
The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X emerges as the overall winner for budget streaming under £300. This processor delivers exceptional single-core performance essential for responsive streaming, incorporates the latest Zen 4 architecture improvements ensuring efficient video encoding, consumes minimal power, and sits competitively priced within the budget. The AM5 socket provides genuine upgrade flexibility, allowing future processor changes without motherboard replacement. For streamers prioritising clean performance, efficiency, and future-proofing within budget constraints, the 7600X represents the optimal balance.
However, the best choice depends on your specific scenario. If you are building a system from scratch and value the lowest total cost, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X on AM4 platform offers exceptional efficiency and budget-friendly motherboard options. If you already own an AM4 motherboard, the Ryzen 7 5700X3D provides superior core count within your existing platform. If you prefer Intel and game whilst streaming, the Core i5-13600K's hybrid architecture ensures strong simultaneous performance. For absolute multi-tasking capacity, the i7-12700K occasionally falls within budget when sales occur, offering substantially more cores than alternatives.
Your final decision should factor platform costs, intended use case (streaming alone versus gaming plus streaming), upgrade plans, and whether you value power efficiency. All six processors listed here handle streaming competently within their respective niches. The budget streaming CPU market in 2024 offers genuine choice, allowing you to select the processor perfectly matched to your streaming ambitions and platform preferences.
Yes, 6-core processors handle streaming competently using modern software encoding. A processor like the Ryzen 5 7600X with strong per-core performance manages streaming smoothly. However, simultaneously gaming at high settings and streaming works best with 8 or more cores, as the additional threads keep your game performance stable whilst the streaming encoder runs independently.
Streaming benefits from both. Single-core speed determines encoding responsiveness and latency in your streaming software, whilst multi-core performance handles simultaneous tasks like gaming, monitoring, and encoding without bottlenecks. Modern processors like the Ryzen 5 7600X and i5-13600K balance both effectively. Avoid older CPUs with weak single-threaded performance even if they offer many cores.
The Ryzen 5 5600X remains viable for streaming despite its age. It handles streaming workloads efficiently and costs considerably less than newer generation options. The main drawback is missing modern architectural improvements and fewer upgrade paths through AM4. For budget-conscious streamers, the 5600X represents excellent value, though the 7600X offers better long-term platform viability.
For AM5 (Ryzen 7000 series), B650 or X670 boards offer good value. For AM4 (older Ryzen), B550 boards provide excellent features affordably. For LGA1700 (Intel 12th/13th gen), B660 boards are budget-friendly with Z690 offering overclocking. Research specific motherboard reviews to match your feature requirements and budget constraints.
For streaming with games, a dedicated GPU significantly improves performance, allowing GPU encoding which frees CPU resources. However, for static content streaming, screen capture, or pre-recorded content, these CPUs manage encoding alone. If gaming and streaming simultaneously, a budget graphics card (£150-300) complements these processors effectively.
