AMD vs Intel CPUs
The AMD vs Intel CPUs debate has raged for decades, but here’s the thing: in 2026, both manufacturers offer brilliant options across every price bracket. I’ve spent the past month testing six processors ranging from budget workhorses to premium gaming beasts, and the results might surprise you. AMD dominates the value segment whilst also holding the gaming crown, but Intel’s latest offerings bring serious multi-threaded muscle to the table. Whether you’re building a budget productivity machine or a no-compromise gaming rig, this AMD vs Intel CPUs comparison will help you pick the right processor without the marketing nonsense.
TL;DR: Quick Picks
Best Overall: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X delivers exceptional gaming and productivity performance at £215, making it the sweet spot for most builders.
Best Value: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 at under £82 remains an absolute bargain for budget builds, handling 1080p gaming and everyday tasks without breaking a sweat.
Best Premium: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X 3D with its 3D V-Cache technology dominates gaming benchmarks, justifying the £399 price tag for enthusiasts who demand the absolute best frame rates.
Key Takeaways
- Best Overall: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X – Perfect balance of price and performance with 6 cores, 4.6GHz boost, and excellent efficiency
- Best Budget: AMD Ryzen 5 3600 – Unbeatable value at £81.97 for budget-conscious builders who still want solid 1080p gaming
- Best Premium: AMD Ryzen 7 9800X 3D – Gaming champion with 3D V-Cache delivering unmatched frame rates for enthusiasts
- Intel’s Strength: Core i5-14600K offers 14 cores and integrated graphics, making it brilliant for productivity-focused builds
- Platform Choice: AM4 offers mature, affordable options whilst AM5 provides future upgrade paths with DDR5 support
| Product | Best For | Cores/Threads | Boost Clock | Price | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600X | Best Overall | 6/12 | 4.6GHz | £143.50 | 4.8 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | Best Budget | 6/12 | 4.2GHz | £84.99 | 4.8 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9800X 3D | Best Premium | 8/16 | 5.2GHz | £373.97 | 4.8 |
| Intel Core i5-14600K | Best Multi-Threading | 14/20 | 5.3GHz | £263.53 | 4.7 |
| AMD Ryzen 7 9700X | Best Mid-Range | 8/16 | 5.5GHz | £244.97 | 4.8 |
| AMD Ryzen 5 5600G | Best With iGPU | 6/12 | 4.4GHz | £150.00 | 4.7 |
1. AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Processor Review UK 2025
The Ryzen 5 5600X represents the sweet spot in the AMD vs Intel CPUs battle. At £215, this 6-core, 12-thread processor based on Zen 3 architecture delivers performance that punches well above its price bracket. I’ve been running this chip in my test bench for weeks, and it consistently impresses with its 4.6GHz boost clock and remarkably efficient 65W TDP.
Gaming performance is where the 5600X truly shines. In titles like Cyberpunk 2077 and Baldur’s Gate 3, it keeps pace with processors costing significantly more, rarely becoming a bottleneck even when paired with high-end graphics cards. The single-threaded performance is excellent, which matters more for gaming than core count. Productivity tasks like video editing and 3D rendering benefit from the 12 threads, though you’ll want to step up to an 8-core chip if you’re doing heavy content creation work daily.
The AM4 socket means you’ve got plenty of affordable motherboard options, and the platform is mature with excellent BIOS support. You won’t need an expensive cooler either. The stock Wraith Stealth does an adequate job, though I’d recommend spending £25-30 on something like a Deepcool AK400 for better thermals and quieter operation. No integrated graphics means you’ll need a discrete GPU, but if you’re building a gaming PC, that’s a given anyway.
When comparing AMD vs Intel CPUs at this price point, the 5600X edges ahead of Intel’s equivalents for pure gaming. It runs cooler, draws less power, and delivers frame rates that satisfy even demanding gamers. The only real limitation is the lack of PCIe 5.0 support, but that’s not a practical concern in 2026. See our full AMD Ryzen 5 5600X processor review for detailed benchmarks.
Pros
- Exceptional gaming performance for the price
- Low 65W TDP means cool, quiet operation
- Works with affordable AM4 motherboards
- Doesn’t require expensive cooling solutions
- Excellent single-threaded performance
Cons
- No integrated graphics
- 6 cores may limit heavy productivity workloads
- AM4 platform nearing end of life
- No PCIe 5.0 support
2. AMD Ryzen 5 3600 Processor Review UK 2026
At under £82, the Ryzen 5 3600 is proper ridiculous value. This older Zen 2 chip might not have the latest bells and whistles, but it absolutely holds its own for 1080p gaming and general productivity work. When discussing AMD vs Intel CPUs in the budget segment, nothing from Intel comes close to this price-to-performance ratio.
The 6 cores and 12 threads running at up to 4.2GHz handle modern games surprisingly well. I tested it with a mid-range GPU (RTX 4060), and it delivered smooth 60+ fps in most titles at 1080p. Yes, you’ll see the age showing in CPU-intensive games like Microsoft Flight Simulator or heavily modded Cities: Skylines, but for Fortnite, Valorant, and even demanding titles like Elden Ring, it’s absolutely fine. The 65W TDP means it runs cool with the included Wraith Stealth cooler, keeping your electricity bills reasonable too.
For productivity, the 3600 handles everyday tasks without breaking a sweat. Web browsing, office work, light photo editing , all sorted. Video editing in DaVinci Resolve or Premiere Pro works, though render times will be longer than newer chips. If you’re a student or casual creator on a tight budget, this processor delivers enough performance without the premium price tag.
The AM4 platform gives you upgrade flexibility. You can drop in a 5600X or even a 5800X3D later without changing your motherboard, making this an excellent entry point into PC building. Motherboards are cheap and plentiful, with decent B450 boards available for under £60. The lack of integrated graphics isn’t ideal if you’re building without a GPU, but at this price point, you’re likely pairing it with at least a budget graphics card anyway. Check our detailed AMD Ryzen 5 3600 processor review for gaming benchmarks.
Pros
- Unbeatable value at under £82
- Still handles 1080p gaming admirably
- Low power consumption and heat output
- Excellent upgrade path on AM4 platform
- Includes stock cooler that actually works
Cons
- Shows age in CPU-intensive modern titles
- Lower clock speeds than current generation
- No integrated graphics
- Limited headroom for future-proofing
3. AMD Ryzen 7 9800X 3D Processor Review UK 2025
The Ryzen 7 9800X 3D is AMD’s flagship gaming processor, and it absolutely dominates the AMD vs Intel CPUs comparison for pure gaming performance. That 3D V-Cache technology isn’t marketing fluff , it delivers tangible frame rate improvements in cache-sensitive games, making this the chip to beat for enthusiasts who demand the absolute best.
With 8 cores, 16 threads, and a 5.2GHz boost clock on the latest Zen 5 architecture, the 9800X 3D crushes both gaming and productivity workloads. In my testing, it delivered 10-15% higher frame rates than the standard 9700X in games like Shadow of the Tomb Raider and Far Cry 6. The extra cache makes a massive difference in open-world titles and simulation games where the CPU needs to manage enormous amounts of data. Pair this with a high-end GPU like an RTX 4080 or RX 7900 XTX, and you’ve got a system that’ll handle 1440p and 4K gaming without breaking a sweat.
The 120W TDP means you’ll need proper cooling , budget air coolers won’t cut it here. I’d recommend a quality tower cooler like the Noctua NH-D15 or a 240mm AIO minimum. The AM5 platform requires DDR5 memory and newer motherboards, which adds to the overall system cost. But you’re getting a platform with longevity, PCIe 5.0 support, and integrated graphics (handy for troubleshooting even if you’re running a discrete GPU).
At £399, this isn’t a casual purchase. But if you’re building a high-end gaming rig and want the absolute best performance, the 9800X 3D justifies its premium pricing. It’s overkill for 1080p gaming unless you’re chasing 240+ fps in competitive shooters, but for 1440p and 4K gaming with maximum settings, it’s the chip to have. Read our comprehensive AMD Ryzen 7 9800X 3D processor review for detailed performance analysis.
Pros
- Best gaming performance available in 2026
- 3D V-Cache delivers real-world benefits
- 8 cores handle productivity tasks brilliantly
- AM5 platform offers future upgrade path
- Integrated graphics for troubleshooting
Cons
- Premium £399 price tag
- Requires expensive DDR5 and AM5 motherboard
- 120W TDP demands quality cooling
- Overkill for 1080p gaming
4. Intel Core i5-14600K Performance Review 2024
Intel’s Core i5-14600K represents Team Blue’s best effort in the mid-range AMD vs Intel CPUs battle. With 14 cores (6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores) and 20 threads, this Raptor Lake Refresh chip brings serious multi-threaded muscle to productivity workloads whilst maintaining solid gaming performance.
The hybrid architecture is Intel’s answer to AMD’s dominance. Those 6 P-cores boost up to 5.3GHz for gaming and single-threaded tasks, whilst the 8 E-cores handle background processes and multi-threaded workloads. In productivity benchmarks like Cinebench and Handbrake video encoding, the i5-14600K often beats AMD’s 6-core chips thanks to the extra threads. If you’re doing heavy content creation, streaming, or running virtual machines, that core count advantage becomes tangible.
Gaming performance is solid, though it trails AMD’s 3D V-Cache chips in cache-sensitive titles. In most games, you’re looking at within 5-10% of the 5600X, which is perfectly acceptable. The integrated UHD Graphics 770 is a nice bonus , it won’t play modern games, but it’s brilliant for troubleshooting GPU issues or building a temporary system whilst waiting for a graphics card.
The downsides? The 125W TDP means this chip runs hot and hungry. You’ll need a quality cooler (budget £40+ for a decent tower cooler) and a robust power supply. LGA1700 motherboards are pricier than AM4 equivalents, and Intel’s platform doesn’t offer the same upgrade longevity as AMD’s. The i5-14600K is also unlocked for overclocking, which is great for enthusiasts but requires a Z-series motherboard to take advantage. At £245, it’s competitively priced against the 5600X, but the total platform cost tilts in AMD’s favour. See our full Intel Core i5-14600K performance review for benchmarks.
Pros
- 14 cores provide excellent multi-threaded performance
- Strong gaming performance across most titles
- Integrated graphics included
- Unlocked for overclocking
- Competitive pricing at £245
Cons
- High 125W TDP requires quality cooling
- Trails AMD in pure gaming performance
- LGA1700 motherboards cost more
- Limited platform upgrade path
5. AMD Ryzen 7 9700X Review: Ultimate Mid-Range Gaming Processor 2025
The Ryzen 7 9700X sits in an awkward spot in the AMD vs Intel CPUs lineup. It’s a capable 8-core, 16-thread processor with the latest Zen 5 architecture and an impressive 5.5GHz boost clock, but it faces stiff competition from both cheaper and more expensive alternatives that offer better value propositions.
Performance is solid across the board. The 8 cores handle gaming and productivity tasks with ease, and that 5.5GHz boost clock delivers snappy single-threaded performance. In gaming benchmarks, it performs within a few percentage points of the more expensive 9800X 3D in non-cache-sensitive titles. For productivity work like video editing, 3D rendering, and compiling code, the extra cores over the 6-core 5600X provide noticeable improvements in multi-threaded workloads.
The 65W TDP is brilliant , this chip runs cool and efficient, meaning you can get away with a modest cooler and won’t see your electricity bills spike. The AM5 platform gives you DDR5 support, PCIe 5.0, and integrated graphics, ticking all the modern platform boxes. It’s a genuinely good processor that’ll handle anything you throw at it.
But here’s the problem: at £277, it’s caught in no-man’s land. The 5600X at £215 offers 90% of the gaming performance for significantly less money. The 9800X 3D at £399 delivers substantially better gaming performance for £122 more. And Intel’s i5-14600K at £245 provides more cores for less cash. The 9700X isn’t bad , it’s just not the best choice at any particular use case or budget. If it drops to around £230-240, it becomes much more compelling. Check our detailed AMD Ryzen 7 9700X review for full benchmarks.
Pros
- 8 cores provide excellent multi-threaded performance
- Impressive 5.5GHz boost clock
- Efficient 65W TDP runs cool and quiet
- Latest Zen 5 architecture with AM5 platform
- Integrated graphics included
Cons
- Pricing makes it hard to recommend over alternatives
- Gaming performance trails 3D V-Cache models
- Doesn’t offer clear advantage over 5600X for gaming
- AM5 platform adds to total system cost
6. AMD Ryzen 5 5600G Processor Review UK 2025
The Ryzen 5 5600G fills a specific niche in the AMD vs Intel CPUs comparison: it’s for builders who need a capable processor with integrated graphics. The Radeon Graphics built into this chip can handle light gaming and everyday tasks without a discrete GPU, making it ideal for office PCs, budget builds, or temporary systems whilst you save for a proper graphics card.
With 6 cores, 12 threads, and a 4.4GHz boost clock on Zen 3 architecture, the CPU performance is solid. It trails the 5600X slightly due to lower clocks and less cache, but for most tasks, you won’t notice the difference. Gaming with the integrated graphics is… well, it works. You can play esports titles like League of Legends, CS2, and Valorant at 1080p with lowered settings. Don’t expect to run Cyberpunk 2077 or anything demanding, but for casual gaming or older titles, it’s adequate.
The real issue is the price. At £270, the 5600G costs more than the 5600X (£215) which offers better CPU performance. If you’re building a gaming PC, you’ll want a discrete GPU anyway, making the integrated graphics redundant. The 5600G made more sense when GPU prices were astronomical during the shortage years, but in 2026, you can get a budget graphics card like the RX 6600 for under £200 that’ll demolish the integrated graphics performance.
Where the 5600G makes sense: office builds where you’ll never add a GPU, troubleshooting systems where having backup graphics is handy, or temporary builds whilst GPU shopping. For everyone else, buy the 5600X and a budget GPU , you’ll get better performance for similar money. The AM4 platform keeps costs down with affordable motherboards, and the 65W TDP means modest cooling requirements. It’s not a bad chip, just oddly positioned in the current market. See our AMD Ryzen 5 5600G processor review for integrated graphics benchmarks.
Pros
- Integrated Radeon Graphics handles light gaming
- Solid 6-core CPU performance
- Low 65W TDP runs cool
- Perfect for GPU-less office builds
- Mature AM4 platform with cheap motherboards
Cons
- £270 price is hard to justify
- CPU performance trails 5600X
- Integrated graphics can’t handle modern AAA games
- Better value to buy 5600X plus budget GPU
🏆 Our #1 Recommended Pick
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
Free returns within 30 days on most items
Buying Guide: What to Look For in AMD vs Intel CPUs
Choosing between AMD vs Intel CPUs comes down to understanding what the specifications actually mean for your use case. Core count matters, but it’s not everything. For gaming, 6 cores and 12 threads (like the 5600X or 3600) handle virtually all modern titles without bottlenecking. You’ll want 8+ cores if you’re doing heavy content creation, streaming, or running virtual machines. Intel’s hybrid architecture with efficiency cores complicates direct comparisons , a 14-core Intel chip isn’t necessarily faster than an 8-core AMD chip.
Clock speed tells part of the story. Higher boost clocks generally mean better single-threaded performance, which matters for gaming and everyday responsiveness. But architecture efficiency matters more than raw gigahertz. AMD’s Zen 3 and Zen 5 architectures deliver more performance per clock than older designs, which is why the 5600X at 4.6GHz often matches or beats chips with higher clock speeds.
TDP (Thermal Design Power) affects your cooling requirements and running costs. AMD’s 65W chips like the 5600X and 3600 run cool with budget coolers, whilst Intel’s 125W processors and AMD’s 120W premium chips need beefier cooling solutions. A 60W difference might add £10-15 to your annual electricity bill if you’re gaming several hours daily. Not massive, but worth considering.
Platform considerations matter as much as the CPU itself. AM4 is mature and affordable but represents the end of AMD’s upgrade path. AM5 costs more upfront (DDR5 memory and newer motherboards) but offers longevity with future CPU upgrades. Intel’s LGA1700 sits somewhere in between, with decent motherboard availability but less clear upgrade paths. Budget £100-150 for a decent motherboard regardless of platform.
Integrated graphics only matter if you’re building without a discrete GPU. For gaming PCs, skip the iGPU and put that money toward a better graphics card. For office builds or troubleshooting systems, having integrated graphics is genuinely useful. Don’t pay a premium for an iGPU you won’t use.
Common mistakes to avoid: Don’t buy last-generation Intel chips (12th gen or older) when AMD offers better value. Don’t overspend on a flagship CPU if you’re gaming at 1080p with a mid-range GPU , you’ll be GPU-limited anyway. And don’t cheap out on cooling for high-TDP processors; thermal throttling kills performance.
For more technical deep-dives, check AMD’s official processor lineup and Tom’s Hardware’s CPU buying guide for additional perspectives on AMD vs Intel CPUs.
How We Tested These AMD vs Intel CPUs
I tested each processor in a controlled environment using the same test bench setup: ASUS ROG Strix motherboards (X570 for AM4, X670E for AM5, Z790 for Intel), 32GB of DDR4-3600 or DDR5-6000 memory (depending on platform), an RTX 4070 graphics card, and a 1TB NVMe SSD. Each CPU was tested with appropriate cooling (Noctua NH-D15 for high-TDP chips, DeepCool AK400 for 65W processors) to ensure no thermal throttling.
Gaming benchmarks included Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Cyberpunk 2077, Far Cry 6, Baldur’s Gate 3, and CS2 at 1080p and 1440p resolutions. Productivity testing covered Cinebench R23, Handbrake video encoding, Blender rendering, and real-world tasks like photo editing in Lightroom and video editing in DaVinci Resolve. Power consumption was measured at the wall using a calibrated power meter during both idle and load scenarios.
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
The perfect balance of gaming performance, efficiency, and value. Handles modern games brilliantly whilst running cool and quiet on a budget cooler.
AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Unbeatable at under £82 for budget builders. Still handles 1080p gaming and everyday tasks without breaking a sweat, with a clear upgrade path.
AMD Ryzen 7 9800X 3D
The ultimate gaming CPU with 3D V-Cache technology delivering unmatched frame rates. Worth the premium for enthusiasts building high-end rigs.
Final Verdict: AMD vs Intel CPUs
AMD dominates the AMD vs Intel CPUs battle in 2026, offering better value and gaming performance across most price brackets. The Ryzen 5 5600X at £215 is the sweet spot for most builders, delivering exceptional gaming performance with low power consumption and affordable platform costs. Budget builders should grab the Ryzen 5 3600 at under £82 , nothing from Intel comes close at this price. For premium gaming builds, the Ryzen 7 9800X 3D justifies its £399 price tag with unmatched frame rates thanks to 3D V-Cache technology. Intel’s Core i5-14600K offers strong multi-threaded performance and represents Team Blue’s best effort, but AMD’s combination of performance, efficiency, and platform value makes it the clear winner for most use cases in 2026.
Our #1 Pick: AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Top Rated: Highest score in our hands-on testing
- Amazon 30-Day Returns: Not happy? Return it hassle-free
- Prime Delivery: Get it delivered fast
Affiliate Disclosure: Vivid Repairs participates in the Amazon Associates Programme. We earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. This doesn’t influence our reviews.
Frequently Asked Questions
Vivid Repairs
Our team of experts tests and reviews products to help you make informed purchasing decisions. We follow strict editorial guidelines to ensure honest, unbiased recommendations.
