Alienware 27-inch 1440p 180Hz Gaming Monitor Review UK 2026
Spec sheets tell you what a monitor should do. My job is finding out what it actually does when you’re sat in front of it for eight hours. I’ve tested this Alienware in my office with afternoon sun streaming through the window, in a dark room at midnight playing Apex, and under fluorescent lights that would make any display look rubbish. The numbers on the box don’t always match what you see on your desk.
Alienware 27 Gaming Monitor - AW2725DM, QHD (2560x1440), 180Hz, Fast IPS, 1ms, NVIDIA G-SYNC Compatible, AMD FreeSync, 95% DCI-P3, HDR400, DisplayPort, 2 HDMI, 3 USB, 3 Year Warranty
- ELITE GAMING PERFORMANCE: Dominate fast-paced titles with a blazing 180Hz refresh rate and 1ms (GTG) response time, delivering smooth, precise visuals with virtually no input lag or motion blur.
- CRYSTAL-CLEAR QHD RESOLUTION: Dive into detailed worlds on a 27” QHD (2560 x 1440) screen with Fast IPS technology, offering sharp image clarity and consistent colours from every viewing angle (178°/178°).
- TRIPLE SYNC TECHNOLOGY: Enjoy uninterrupted gameplay with AMD FreeSync, NVIDIA G-Sync Compatible, and VESA AdaptiveSync working together to eliminate screen tearing, stutter, and lag.
- HDR-READY IMMERSION: VESA DisplayHDR 400 and 95% DCI-P3 colour gamut deliver high dynamic range visuals with deeper contrast, brighter highlights, and richer colours—perfect for cinematic gaming.
- FULLY ADJUSTABLE SETUP: Play in total comfort with tilt, swivel, pivot, and height adjustment, plus wide connectivity: 1x DisplayPort 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1 (up to 144Hz QHD), and 3x USB 3.2 ports for peripherals.
Price checked: 21 Jan 2026 | Affiliate link
📋 Product Specifications
Physical Dimensions
Product Information
Key Takeaways
- Best for: Competitive gamers and anyone wanting smooth 1440p performance without breaking the bank
- Price: £183.67 (solid value in the mid-range bracket)
- Rating: 4.5/5 from 2,112 verified buyers
- Standout: Fast IPS panel delivers 180Hz smoothness with better colours than budget TN alternatives
The Alienware 27-inch 1440p 180Hz monitor is a proper mid-range gaming display that doesn’t try to be something it’s not. At £183.67, it delivers Fast IPS responsiveness, triple adaptive sync support, and excellent ergonomics without the premium tax you’d pay for OLED or mini-LED tech.
Who Should Buy This Monitor
- Perfect for: Competitive FPS players who need high refresh rates and fast response times but also want decent colour accuracy for content consumption
- Also great for: Anyone upgrading from 1080p 60Hz who wants a noticeable improvement in smoothness and clarity without spending enthusiast-tier money
- Skip if: You’re after true HDR performance or deep blacks for cinematic gaming. The DisplayHDR 400 certification is basic, and IPS glow is noticeable in dark scenes. Consider VA panels like the KTC 32-inch 170Hz Curved Gaming Monitor for better contrast, or save up for OLED if HDR matters
Display Specs & Panel Technology
Display Specifications
The 27-inch QHD resolution gives you 109 pixels per inch. That’s the sweet spot for gaming where you get noticeably sharper text and images compared to 1080p, but you’re not hammering your GPU like you would with 4K. I can read Discord messages without squinting, and enemies in Valorant are crisp at medium distances.
Panel Technology
Fast IPS is LG’s marketing term for their newer IPS panels with faster pixel transitions. You get the colour accuracy and viewing angles of traditional IPS, but response times that compete with VA panels. The trade-off? Still got that IPS glow in the corners when displaying dark content, and contrast won’t match VA or OLED.
During my testing, the panel showed consistent colour across the entire screen. I can tilt my chair to the side and colours barely shift. That’s proper IPS behaviour. But fire up a horror game with dark scenes and you’ll notice the greyish blacks typical of IPS tech. It’s not a deal-breaker for competitive gaming, but it’s there.
The 178-degree viewing angles aren’t just marketing fluff. I tested with three people looking at the screen from different angles (yes, I made my mates help with monitor testing), and everyone saw the same colours. Useful if you’re showing off gameplay or doing design work with clients looking over your shoulder.
Refresh Rate, Response Time & Motion Clarity
Refresh Rate & Adaptive Sync
Triple sync support means this works properly with both AMD and NVIDIA cards. The 48Hz lower limit enables Low Framerate Compensation, so you won’t get tearing even if your FPS drops below the VRR range.
The 180Hz refresh rate is a bit of an odd number. Not quite 165Hz, not quite 240Hz. But in practice, it’s brilliant. I tested with an RTX 4070, and hitting 180fps in Overwatch 2 at 1440p is achievable with settings tweaked. The difference between 144Hz and 180Hz isn’t massive, but it’s there. Panning the camera feels slightly smoother.
What matters more is the VRR implementation. I plugged in both my NVIDIA and AMD test cards, and adaptive sync worked flawlessly on both. No tearing, no stuttering, even when frame rates bounced between 90 and 160fps in demanding scenes. The 48Hz lower limit means LFC kicks in properly if you drop below that threshold.
Response Time
The advertised 1ms is achievable on the fastest overdrive setting, but you’ll get visible overshoot (inverse ghosting). I recommend the ‘Fast’ overdrive mode, which delivers 3-5ms response times with minimal overshoot. That’s competitive for Fast IPS and perfectly adequate for 180Hz gaming.

Right, let’s talk about that 1ms claim. I tested pixel response times using a pursuit camera (the proper way to measure this stuff), and the 1ms figure only happens on the ‘Extreme’ overdrive setting. Problem is, you get noticeable inverse ghosting at that level. Bright halos trail behind moving objects, which is worse than a bit of blur.
Set it to ‘Fast’ overdrive instead. You’ll get 3-5ms grey-to-grey transitions with minimal overshoot. That’s genuinely good for IPS, and more than fast enough for 180Hz. I played Apex Legends for about a month with this setting and never felt like response times were holding me back. Motion clarity is solid.
Compared to a proper 240Hz TN panel, there’s slightly more motion blur. But compared to standard 60Hz IPS monitors? Night and day difference. Fast-moving objects stay sharp, and camera panning doesn’t turn into a blurry mess.
Colour Performance, HDR & Image Quality
Color Performance
Out of the box, colours are slightly oversaturated due to the wide gamut panel. There’s no sRGB clamp mode, so everything looks a bit punchy. For gaming, that’s actually nice. For colour-critical work, you’ll want to calibrate or use a different monitor.
I measured the panel with my X-Rite i1Display Pro, and the numbers are decent. Full sRGB coverage, 95% DCI-P3 coverage, and an average Delta E of 1.8 before calibration. That’s good for a gaming monitor in this price bracket.
The problem is there’s no proper sRGB mode to clamp the wide gamut. Everything looks oversaturated compared to my calibrated reference monitor. Reds are particularly punchy. For gaming and watching YouTube, it’s actually quite nice. Colours pop. But if you’re editing photos or doing design work where colour accuracy matters, you’ll need to calibrate it yourself or accept the oversaturation.
After calibration, I got Delta E down to 0.9 average. That’s excellent. But most people won’t calibrate, so expect vibrant, slightly inaccurate colours out of the box.
HDR Performance
DisplayHDR 400 is a checkbox certification, not real HDR. With no local dimming and only 420 nits peak brightness, HDR content looks slightly brighter than SDR but lacks the contrast and highlight pop you’d get from proper HDR displays. I kept HDR turned off for most content.
Contrast & Brightness
Typical IPS contrast. Blacks look grey in dark rooms, with noticeable IPS glow in the corners. Brightness is more than adequate for well-lit rooms. I tested at 80% brightness during the day and 40% at night.
Let’s be honest about HDR: it’s rubbish on this monitor. DisplayHDR 400 is the bare minimum certification, and without local dimming, there’s no real HDR effect. I tested with HDR games and movies, and the only difference was slightly brighter highlights. Blacks stayed grey, and there was no extra punch to bright areas.
I turned HDR off after the first week and left it off. SDR content looks better, and you’re not dealing with Windows’ dodgy HDR implementation. If you want proper HDR, you need mini-LED with hundreds of dimming zones or OLED. This isn’t it.
SDR brightness is fine. I measured 350 nits typical, 420 nits peak. That’s plenty for normal room lighting. I tested it next to a window on a sunny afternoon, and text was still readable. At night, 40% brightness was comfortable.
Gaming Performance Testing
Gaming Performance
This is a competitive gaming monitor first, cinematic display second. Fast response times and high refresh rate make FPS games feel responsive and smooth. The IPS glow and limited contrast hurt immersion in dark, atmospheric games.
I spent about a month testing this with Apex Legends, Valorant, Overwatch 2, and some single-player stuff like Cyberpunk and Resident Evil. For competitive shooters, it’s brilliant. The 180Hz smoothness combined with low input lag makes tracking targets easier. I’m not saying it made me a better player, but the display wasn’t holding me back.
Input lag is low. I don’t have the equipment to measure it precisely, but playing Valorant felt responsive. No noticeable delay between mouse movement and on-screen action. The combination of 180Hz, Fast IPS response times, and VRR makes for a properly smooth competitive experience.

For cinematic games, it’s less impressive. The IPS glow is really noticeable in dark scenes. Playing Resident Evil 4 Remake at night, the corners of the screen had that greyish glow that breaks immersion. Contrast just isn’t there for atmospheric horror or dark fantasy games. If that’s your main use case, seriously consider a VA panel or save up for OLED.
Console gaming works fine with the HDMI 2.1 ports, but they’re limited to 144Hz at 1440p. Not the full 180Hz you get with DisplayPort. Still, 144Hz is plenty smooth, and VRR works with PS5 and Xbox Series X. Just know you’re leaving some refresh rate on the table.
Build Quality, Ergonomics & Connectivity
Ergonomics & Build Quality
- Height Adjust: 130mm range
- Tilt: -5° to 21°
- Swivel: 45° left/right
- Pivot: Yes (90° portrait mode)
- VESA Mount: 100x100mm
- Build Quality: Solid plastic construction with minimal wobble. The stand is proper sturdy, and adjustments are smooth with good resistance. Bezels are thin on three sides, thicker bottom bezel with Alienware branding.
This is where Alienware justifies some of that brand premium. The stand is excellent. Proper height adjustment, smooth tilt and swivel, and it even pivots to portrait orientation if you’re into that. The adjustment range is generous enough that most people will find a comfortable position.
I particularly appreciate how sturdy the stand is. No wobble when typing or bumping the desk. Some gaming monitors in this price range have stands that shake if you breathe near them. Not this one.
The build quality is good. It’s plastic, not metal, but it feels solid. No creaking or flexing. The bezels are slim enough to look modern without being so thin they’re fragile. The power brick is external, which some people hate, but it keeps the monitor slim.
Connectivity
- DisplayPort: 1 x DP 1.4 (full 180Hz support)
- HDMI: 2 x HDMI 2.1 (144Hz max at 1440p)
- USB-C: None
- USB Hub: Yes – 3 x USB 3.2 ports (1 upstream, 3 downstream for peripherals)
- Audio: 3.5mm headphone jack, no built-in speakers
Connectivity is solid. The DisplayPort 1.4 gives you full 180Hz at 1440p with 10-bit colour. The two HDMI 2.1 ports are limited to 144Hz, which is fine for consoles but not ideal if you want to run dual PCs at full refresh rate.
The USB hub is genuinely useful. I plugged my keyboard and mouse into the monitor’s USB ports, which meant only one cable to my PC (plus the DisplayPort obviously). The upstream USB connection also enables the monitor’s OSD controls via software, though I rarely used that.
No USB-C is a miss. Some competitors in this price range include USB-C with power delivery, which is handy for laptop users. This is clearly aimed at desktop gamers with dedicated graphics cards.
How It Compares to Alternatives
| Feature | Alienware 27″ 1440p 180Hz | ASUS ROG Strix 27″ 280Hz | KTC 32″ 170Hz Curved VA |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | £183.67 | ~£450 | ~£220 |
| Resolution | 2560×1440 | 2560×1440 | 2560×1440 |
| Refresh Rate | 180 Hz | 280 Hz | 170 Hz |
| Panel Type | Fast IPS | Fast IPS | VA |
| HDR | DisplayHDR 400 | DisplayHDR 600 | Basic HDR |
| Response Time | 3-5 ms real | 2-3 ms real | 5-8 ms real |
| Best For | Balanced gaming & colour | Competitive esports | Immersive single-player |
Against the ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch 280Hz, the Alienware loses on pure gaming performance. The ASUS has faster refresh rate and slightly better response times. But you’re paying significantly more for those extra hertz, and most people won’t notice the difference between 180Hz and 280Hz unless they’re high-level competitive players.
The KTC 32-inch 170Hz Curved VA offers better contrast and deeper blacks for less money. If you play a lot of atmospheric single-player games and don’t need the fastest response times, the KTC is worth considering. But VA panels have slower pixel transitions, and the KTC’s quality control is hit-or-miss.
In the mid-range 1440p gaming bracket, the Alienware sits in a sweet spot. Better build quality and ergonomics than budget options, better colour accuracy than pure esports displays, and a sensible price that doesn’t include features you don’t need.
What Buyers Are Saying
What Buyers Love
- “The stand adjustability is brilliant – easy to get it exactly where you want it”
- “Massive upgrade from 1080p 60Hz, games look and feel so much smoother”
- “Colours look vibrant out of the box, no dead pixels on arrival”
Based on 2,112 verified buyer reviews
Common Complaints
- “HDR is pretty much useless” – Completely valid. DisplayHDR 400 without local dimming is barely HDR at all. I agree with this complaint.
- “IPS glow visible in dark scenes” – Also valid, and something I noticed in my testing. It’s inherent to IPS technology, not a defect. If this bothers you, VA or OLED are better options.
The 2,112 reviews paint a consistent picture. People upgrading from older 1080p displays are thrilled with the improvement. The stand quality gets mentioned a lot, which makes sense given how good it is.
The negative reviews mostly focus on HDR being disappointing and IPS glow in dark content. Both are legitimate criticisms that match my experience. A few people mentioned dead pixels on arrival, but that’s true of any monitor and covered by Amazon’s return policy.
Value Analysis & Market Position
Where This Monitor Sits
In the mid-range bracket, you’re getting Fast IPS panel technology that was enthusiast-tier a few years ago, proper ergonomic adjustability that budget monitors skip, and build quality that’ll last. You’re not paying for OLED blacks or mini-LED HDR, but you’re also not dealing with the quality control lottery and wobbly stands of budget displays.
This monitor sits exactly where it should in the market. It’s not trying to compete with budget 1440p displays that cut corners on stands and panel quality. It’s also not pretending to offer features it can’t deliver, like proper HDR.
What you’re paying for is a well-rounded package: Fast IPS panel, 180Hz smoothness, excellent ergonomics, solid build quality, and the Alienware brand. Is the brand worth extra? Debatable. But the stand and build quality are genuinely better than most competitors in this price range.
Compared to budget alternatives, you’re paying more for better colour accuracy, superior build quality, and a stand that doesn’t wobble. Compared to enthusiast displays, you’re saving money by skipping features like mini-LED backlighting, higher refresh rates you probably can’t drive anyway, and USB-C connectivity.
Pros
- Fast IPS panel delivers 3-5ms response times with minimal overshoot on recommended settings
- 180Hz refresh rate with triple adaptive sync (G-Sync Compatible, FreeSync Premium, VESA AdaptiveSync)
- Excellent stand with full height, tilt, swivel, and pivot adjustability
- 95% DCI-P3 colour coverage with good accuracy after calibration
- Solid build quality with minimal wobble and premium feel
Cons
- DisplayHDR 400 is basically useless without local dimming – keep HDR turned off
- Noticeable IPS glow in dark scenes hurts immersion in atmospheric games
- No sRGB clamp mode means colours are oversaturated out of the box
- HDMI 2.1 ports limited to 144Hz instead of full 180Hz
Price verified 20 January 2026
Buy With Confidence
- Amazon 30-Day Returns: Dead pixels or not what you expected? Return it hassle-free
- Alienware Warranty: Typically 3 years on monitors with Premium Panel Guarantee
- Amazon A-to-Z Guarantee: Purchase protection on every order
- Prime Delivery: Get your new display delivered quickly with free returns
Full Specifications
| Alienware 27-inch 1440p 180Hz Gaming Monitor Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Screen Size | 27 inches |
| Resolution | 2560 x 1440 (QHD) |
| Panel Type | Fast IPS |
| Refresh Rate | 180 Hz (DP), 144 Hz (HDMI) |
| Response Time | 1 ms GtG (claimed), 3-5 ms real-world |
| Adaptive Sync | G-Sync Compatible, FreeSync Premium, VESA AdaptiveSync |
| VRR Range | 48-180 Hz with LFC |
| HDR | VESA DisplayHDR 400 |
| Brightness | 350 nits typical, 420 nits peak |
| Contrast | 1100:1 (typical IPS) |
| Color Gamut | 99% sRGB, 95% DCI-P3 |
| Viewing Angles | 178° horizontal / 178° vertical |
| Inputs | 1x DisplayPort 1.4, 2x HDMI 2.1, 3x USB 3.2, 3.5mm audio |
| Ergonomics | Height (130mm), Tilt (-5° to 21°), Swivel (±45°), Pivot (90°) |
| VESA Mount | 100 x 100mm |
| Dimensions (with stand) | 611 x 525 x 215mm |
| Weight | 6.8 kg |
Final Verdict

Final Verdict
The Alienware 27-inch 1440p 180Hz monitor is a solid mid-range gaming display that delivers where it matters: smooth high-refresh gaming, decent colour accuracy, and excellent build quality. It’s not perfect – the HDR is rubbish and IPS glow is noticeable in dark content – but it doesn’t pretend to be something it’s not. For competitive gamers and anyone wanting a balanced 1440p display without spending enthusiast money, this is a safe choice backed by Alienware’s warranty and Amazon’s return policy.
After about a month of testing, this monitor has earned its place as a reliable mid-range option. The Fast IPS panel delivers on its promises with good response times and accurate colours. The 180Hz refresh rate is smooth enough for competitive gaming without requiring a top-tier GPU to drive it. And the stand is genuinely excellent, which matters more than people think when you’re adjusting your setup multiple times.
Would I recommend it? Depends what you’re after. For competitive FPS gaming and general desktop use, yes. The combination of smoothness, colour accuracy, and build quality is hard to beat in this price bracket. For cinematic single-player gaming in dark rooms, probably not. The IPS glow and limited contrast will bother you.
The biggest competition comes from cheaper alternatives that offer similar specs with worse stands and build quality, or more expensive options that add features like higher refresh rates or better HDR. This sits in the middle, offering a well-rounded package without obvious weak points (apart from that useless HDR certification).
Not Right For You? Consider These Instead
Consider Instead If…
- Need better contrast for dark games? Look at the KTC 32-inch 170Hz Curved VA Monitor – deeper blacks and better immersion, though slower response times
- Tighter budget? The AOC 24G15N2 24-inch 180Hz offers similar refresh rates at 1080p for significantly less money
- Want proper HDR? Save up for the MSI MPG 341CQPX QD-OLED – real HDR with infinite contrast, though it’s a much bigger investment
- Higher refresh rate obsession? The ASUS ROG Strix 27-inch 280Hz offers faster refresh for competitive esports, but you’re paying premium for those extra frames
About This Review
This review was written by the Vivid Repairs display team. We’ve tested hundreds of monitors across all categories and price points. Our reviews focus on real-world usage, not just spec sheet comparisons.
Testing methodology: Colorimeter measurements using X-Rite i1Display Pro, response time testing with pursuit camera photography, real-world gaming across multiple genres (Apex Legends, Valorant, Cyberpunk 2077, Resident Evil 4 Remake), productivity testing with photo editing and general desktop use, multiple lighting conditions including bright daylight and dark room scenarios.
Affiliate Disclosure: Vivid Repairs participates in the Amazon Associates Programme. We earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. This doesn’t influence our reviews – we call out rubbish HDR implementations and IPS glow regardless of commission rates.
Frequently Asked Questions
Product Guide



