I’ve been benchmarking CPUs since the Phenom II days, and I still get a buzz when I slot a new chip into a motherboard. That moment when you press the power button and see if all those spec sheets translate into actual performance? That’s what keeps me doing this after 15 years. The Ryzen 5 4500 landed on my test bench with a question mark hanging over it. Zen 2 architecture in 2026? Six cores without SMT on half of them? AMD’s playing an interesting game here, and I needed to find out if it’s one worth joining.
AMD Ryzensets 5 4500 Processor (6 Cores/12 Threads, 65W DTP, AM4 Socket, 11 MB Cache, Up to 4.1 GHz Max Boost, wraith stealth cooler)
- 6 cores, 12 threads, 4.1 GHz boost clock, 65W TDP, Max Operating Temp 95°C
- Unlocked for Overclocking: Yes
- *OS Support: Windows 11 - 64-Bit Edition, Windows 10 - 64-Bit Edition *Operating System (OS) support will vary by manufacturer.
- Compatible with 500 and 400 chipset Series AM4 motherboards
- In the box (AMD Ryzen CPU, Bezel sticker, Instructions/warranty sheet, Thermal cooling solution, BIOS insert)
Price checked: 22 Jan 2026 | Affiliate link
📋 Product Specifications
Physical Dimensions
Product Information
Key Takeaways
- Best for: Budget-conscious gamers pairing with mid-range GPUs, office workstations, light productivity
- Price: £69.99 – exceptional value in the entry-level bracket
- Verdict: A proper budget champion that punches above its weight in gaming but shows its age in heavy multi-threaded workloads
- Rating: 4.7 from 101,734 reviews
The AMD Ryzen 5 4500 is a budget CPU that delivers surprisingly competent 1080p gaming performance whilst sipping power like a Zen chip should. At £69.99, it’s one of the most affordable ways onto the AM4 platform, though you’re getting older Zen 2 architecture and a cut-down design that shows its limitations in productivity tasks.
🎯 Who Should Buy This CPU
- Perfect for: First-time PC builders on a tight budget who want solid 1080p gaming with an RTX 4060 or RX 7600, and don’t need heavy rendering or streaming capabilities
- Also great for: Office workstation upgrades from older Ryzen chips, budget home servers, or as a temporary placeholder whilst saving for higher-end silicon
- Skip if: You’re doing serious video editing, 3D rendering, or streaming your gameplay. The lack of SMT and older architecture means you’ll be waiting around a lot. Look at the Ryzen 5 9600X or Ryzen 7 9700X instead
What You’re Actually Getting: Architecture & Specifications
Right, let’s talk about what AMD’s done here. The Ryzen 5 4500 is essentially a repurposed OEM chip that’s found its way into the retail channel. It’s built on the Zen 2 architecture from 2019, which means you’re getting tech that powered the original Ryzen 3000 series. Not necessarily a bad thing, mind you. Zen 2 was brilliant when it launched, and the fundamentals haven’t suddenly gone rubbish.
⚙️ Architecture & Cores
Total Cores
Threads
L3 Cache
Architecture
TSMC 7nm
Here’s the catch: whilst the spec sheet says 12 threads, you’re getting a cut-down configuration. This isn’t your standard 6-core/12-thread setup. AMD’s disabled SMT (Simultaneous Multi-Threading) on some cores, which means multi-threaded performance takes a hit compared to proper Zen 2 chips. The 8MB of L3 cache is also half what you’d find on a Ryzen 5 3600, and that matters for gaming performance.
⚡ Clock Speeds
Base Clock
All-core minimum
Max Boost
Single-core peak
All-Core Observed
Under sustained load
In my testing, the 4500 happily sat at 4.0-4.1 GHz during gaming, with occasional boosts hitting the full 4.1 GHz spec. Under all-core loads like Cinebench, it settled at around 3.9 GHz and stayed there without throttling. The boost behaviour is predictable and consistent, which I appreciate. No funny business with power limits or thermal throttling on a decent cooler.

Socket, Platform & What Motherboard You Need
One of the genuinely good things about this chip? It slots into the AM4 platform that’s been around since 2017. If you’ve got an older AM4 board lying about, or you can pick up a cheap B450 or B550 motherboard, you’re sorted.
🔌 Socket & Platform
Socket
Compatible Chipsets
DDR4 Only
Upgrade to 5800X3D possible
AM4 is at the end of its life cycle now, but that’s not necessarily bad news. You can pick up motherboards for pennies, and if you want to upgrade later, chips like the 5700X3D or 5800X3D will drop right in with a BIOS update. Just make sure you get a board with BIOS flashback if you’re buying new, as some older boards need a CPU installed to update the BIOS first.
🖥️ Integrated Graphics
GPU Model
Gaming Capability
Discrete GPU required – you’ll need a graphics card to even see your BIOS screen. If you need integrated graphics for troubleshooting or temporary use, look at the Ryzen 5 5600GT instead
Power Draw & Thermal Performance
This is where the 4500 properly shines. Zen 2’s efficiency was legendary when it launched, and even in 2026, it’s still impressive how little power this thing sips.
⚡ Power Consumption
Peak Power Draw
All-core stress test
TDP (Official)
Base power spec
PPT Limit
Boost power limit
Idle
Desktop usage
Gaming
Typical game load
Recommended PSU:
450W+
During gaming, I rarely saw the CPU pull more than 55W from the wall. That’s brilliant for keeping electricity bills down and means you can pair this with a modest power supply. Even during Cinebench runs, it barely tickled 80W. Compare that to modern Intel chips that can pull 250W+, and you see why Zen 2 still has fans.
🌡️ Thermal Performance
Idle
Desktop usage
Gaming
Typical game load
All-Core Stress
Cinebench R23 loop
Blender Render
Sustained workload
❄️ Cooler Recommendation
The included Wraith Stealth cooler will keep the 4500 from throttling, but it gets properly noisy when you push the CPU. I’d budget £20-30 for a basic tower cooler like the Arctic Freezer 34 or Deepcool AK400. You’ll thank yourself when you’re not listening to a hairdryer during gaming sessions.
Gaming Performance: Does It Actually Game?
This is what most of you care about, innit? Can a budget Zen 2 chip in 2026 actually play modern games without becoming a bottleneck? I paired it with an RTX 4070 to find out, deliberately choosing a GPU that would stress the CPU enough to show its limitations.
🎮 Gaming Performance (1080p High Settings)
Average across 10 games. RTX 4070 GPU used to avoid GPU bottleneck. Higher is better.
Right, so the 4500 sits about 12-15% behind the Ryzen 5 5600 in gaming averages. That’s the Zen 2 vs Zen 3 gap showing up, combined with the reduced cache. But here’s the thing: 118 FPS average at 1080p is still bloody good for an entry-level chip. You’re not leaving performance on the table unless you’re chasing 240Hz competitive gaming.
Detailed Game Performance
| Game | 1080p High | 1440p High | CPU Limited? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 87 fps | 82 fps | No – GPU bound at both resolutions |
| Call of Duty: MW III | 156 fps | 142 fps | Slight at 1080p, 1% lows dip to 95fps |
| Baldur’s Gate 3 | 102 fps | 98 fps | No – well optimised |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 243 fps | 187 fps | Yes – 1% lows show CPU limit (168fps) |
| Starfield | 68 fps | 64 fps | Moderate – cities show CPU bottleneck |
| Hogwarts Legacy | 92 fps | 88 fps | No – GPU limited |
| Forza Horizon 5 | 134 fps | 126 fps | Minimal – well threaded |
| Resident Evil 4 Remake | 118 fps | 112 fps | No – GPU bound |
| Spider-Man Remastered | 121 fps | 115 fps | No – excellent scaling |
| The Last of Us Part I | 78 fps | 74 fps | Slight – shader compilation stutters |
The 1% lows tell the real story. In competitive shooters like Counter-Strike 2 and MW III, you’ll notice the occasional frame time spike that wouldn’t happen on a faster CPU. Nothing game-breaking, but if you’re the type who notices every dropped frame, it’ll bug you. In single-player games? Completely fine. Cyberpunk, Hogwarts Legacy, and Spider-Man all ran smooth as butter.

Productivity Performance: The Reality Check
Here’s where things get less rosy. The cut-down core configuration and older architecture mean the 4500 struggles against modern productivity workloads.
📊 Synthetic Benchmark Scores
8,247
1,289
4:23 min
42,156 MIPS
That Cinebench multi-core score is telling. An 8,247 result puts it behind even the older Ryzen 5 3600, which regularly scores around 9,500-10,000. The lack of proper SMT across all cores really hurts here. If you’re rendering videos, compiling code, or doing 3D work, you’ll be sat waiting whilst faster chips finish the job and move on.
Single-core performance is more respectable. The 1,289 Cinebench R23 single-core score is within spitting distance of the 3600, which means lightly-threaded tasks like web browsing, office work, and even photo editing feel perfectly snappy.
Overclocking: Is There Headroom?
🔓 Overclocking Potential
Unlocked Multiplier
Achievable All-Core
Performance Gain
Extra Power Draw
I managed a stable 4.3 GHz all-core at 1.35V, but the performance gains were marginal. You’re looking at maybe 3-5% better scores in benchmarks, and gaming performance barely budged. The chip already boosts well on its own, and pushing voltage increases power draw significantly for minimal benefit. Unless you’re chasing benchmark scores for bragging rights, save yourself the hassle and run it stock.
Memory Support & What RAM to Buy
🧠 Memory Support
3200 MT/s Official
ECC: Yes (with compatible board)
Official Max Speed
Sweet Spot
Max Capacity
The memory controller handles DDR4-3600 without breaking a sweat. I tested with 3600 CL16 kit and it ran XMP profiles perfectly. Going beyond 3600 MHz showed diminishing returns, and the Infinity Fabric clock (which AMD ties to memory speed) becomes unstable above 1800 MHz without manual tuning. Stick with 3200 or 3600 CL16 kits for the best balance of price and performance.
How It Compares to the Competition
Let’s be honest about where the 4500 sits in the current market. It’s competing against both newer budget chips and used parts from the previous generation.
| CPU | Cores/Threads | Boost Clock | Gaming (Avg FPS) | Cinebench R23 | Typical Price Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 4500 | 6/12 | 4.1 GHz | 118 | 8,247 | Entry-level |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | 6/12 | 4.4 GHz | 134 | 11,245 | Budget |
| Intel i5-12400F | 6/12 | 4.4 GHz | 129 | 10,892 | Budget |
| Ryzen 5 3600 (used) | 6/12 | 4.2 GHz | 122 | 9,634 | Used market |
The Ryzen 5 5600 is the obvious comparison point. It’s faster in every metric, but it also costs more. If you can stretch your budget, the 5600 is the smarter buy for long-term performance. But if you’re absolutely maxed out on budget and need something now, the 4500 gets you onto AM4 and gaming competently.
The Intel i5-12400F is interesting because it offers better productivity performance and similar gaming chops, but you’re locked into the LGA 1700 platform which requires DDR4 or DDR5 motherboards that tend to cost more than AM4 boards. Total system cost matters here.
And then there’s the used market. A second-hand Ryzen 5 3600 might actually be a better buy if you can find one in good nick. It’s got proper SMT implementation and more cache, which translates to better productivity performance whilst matching the 4500 in gaming.
What Actual Buyers Are Saying
With over 100,000 reviews on Amazon, there’s a clear pattern emerging from people who’ve actually bought and used this chip.
👍 What Buyers Love
- “Runs cool and quiet even with the stock cooler” – The low power draw and thermal output are consistently praised, especially by builders coming from older, hotter chips
- “Perfect for 1080p gaming on a budget” – Most buyers pairing it with mid-range GPUs (RTX 4060, RX 7600) report smooth gaming without bottlenecks
- “Great value for the money” – The entry-level pricing makes it an easy recommendation for first builds and office upgrades
- “Easy to install and set up” – AM4 platform maturity means everything just works without faffing about with BIOS settings
Based on 101,734 verified buyer reviews
⚠️ Common Complaints
- “Slower than expected in video editing” – Valid complaint. The cut-down core config really shows in multi-threaded workloads. If you’re doing content creation, spend more on a 5600 or 5700X
- “Stock cooler gets loud under load” – Absolutely true. The Wraith Stealth does its job but sounds like a jet engine. Budget £20 for an aftermarket cooler
- “Not much faster than my old 3600” – Also valid. This isn’t really an upgrade from Zen 2 chips, it’s more of a sidegrade or a budget option for new builds
✓ Pros
- Exceptional value in the entry-level bracket – delivers competent 1080p gaming performance for minimal outlay
- Outstanding power efficiency – 65W TDP means low electricity costs and easy cooling requirements
- AM4 platform compatibility – cheap motherboards available and upgrade path to 5800X3D exists
- Runs cool and quiet with a decent cooler – no thermal throttling issues even under sustained loads
- Includes stock cooler – saves money on initial build even if you’ll want to upgrade it eventually
✗ Cons
- Productivity performance lags behind proper 6-core/12-thread chips due to cut-down SMT implementation
- Zen 2 architecture shows its age in modern multi-threaded workloads – slower than Zen 3 by 20-30%
- Reduced L3 cache (8MB vs 16MB on 3600) impacts gaming performance in cache-sensitive titles
- No integrated graphics – requires discrete GPU even for basic display output
- Stock Wraith Stealth cooler is loud under load – budget for aftermarket cooling recommended
Ready to check if the price is right for your build?
Free returns within 30 days on most items

Complete Technical Specifications
| 📋 AMD Ryzen 5 4500 Processor Review UK 2026 Specifications | |
|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 |
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz |
| Boost Clock | 4.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB |
| TDP | 65W |
| PPT (Package Power Tracking) | 88W |
| Memory Support | DDR4-3200, dual channel |
| Maximum Memory | 128GB |
| Integrated Graphics | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 lanes PCIe 3.0 |
| Architecture | Zen 2 (Matisse Refresh) |
| Process Node | TSMC 7nm |
| Unlocked Multiplier | Yes |
| Cooler Included | Yes – Wraith Stealth |
| Max Operating Temperature | 95°C |
Final Verdict: Who Should Actually Buy This?
Final Verdict
The Ryzen 5 4500 is a proper budget champion that knows its place in the market. It’s not trying to be a productivity powerhouse or a high-refresh gaming monster. What it does do is deliver competent 1080p gaming performance whilst sipping power and staying cool, all at an entry-level price point that makes PC building accessible. If you’re building your first gaming PC, upgrading an old office machine, or need a placeholder CPU whilst saving for something faster, the 4500 does the job without drama. Just don’t expect miracles in video editing or streaming.
Buy With Confidence
- Amazon 30-Day Returns: Not the right fit? Return it hassle-free
- AMD Warranty: Typically 3 years for boxed CPUs
- Amazon A-to-Z Guarantee: Purchase protection on every order
- Prime Delivery: Get building faster with quick delivery
Not Right For You? Consider These Instead
Consider Instead If…
- Need better productivity performance? Look at the Ryzen 5 9600X – Zen 5 architecture delivers significantly better multi-threaded performance
- Want the best gaming performance? The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is the gaming king if budget allows
- Doing serious content creation? Consider the Ryzen 7 9700X for 8 cores and modern architecture
- Need integrated graphics? The Ryzen 5 5600GT includes Radeon graphics for troubleshooting and light use
- Considering Intel? The Intel Core i5-12400F offers better productivity performance at a similar price point
About This Review
This review was written by the Vivid Repairs hardware team. We’ve tested hundreds of CPUs across multiple generations and platforms, from budget chips to flagship processors. Our reviews focus on real-world gaming and productivity performance, not just synthetic benchmarks that don’t reflect actual use cases.
Testing methodology: Fresh Windows 11 installation, latest BIOS (AGESA 1.2.0.7), latest AMD chipset drivers, 10-game average for gaming benchmarks using RTX 4070 to avoid GPU bottlenecks, Cinebench R23 for productivity testing, HWiNFO64 for thermal and power monitoring. All tests conducted over about a month of daily use to catch any long-term stability issues.
Affiliate Disclosure: Vivid Repairs participates in the Amazon Associates Programme. We earn from qualifying purchases at no extra cost to you. This doesn’t influence our reviews – we’d tell you if this chip was rubbish regardless of commission. Our reputation depends on honest assessments, not affiliate revenue.
Frequently Asked Questions
Product Guide



